I recently came across a thought-provoking article on The Guardian by Arash Abizadeh, titled “Academic journals are a lucrative scam – and we’re determined to change that.” This article sheds light on the exploitative practices of the big five academic publishers: Elsevier, Wiley, Taylor & Francis, Springer Nature, and SAGE. These publishers generate billions in revenue, with profit margins that often surpass tech giants like Google, all while relying on the unpaid labor of academics.
Abizadeh highlights how these publishers charge exorbitant fees for access to journals, making it difficult for universities and the public to access essential research. The article discusses the impact of these practices on the academic community and the broader public, emphasizing the need for a shift towards “diamond” open access models. These models eliminate the financial burden on authors, editors, and readers, making research freely accessible to all.
“The commercial stranglehold on academic publishing is doing considerable damage to our intellectual and scientific culture. As disinformation and propaganda spread freely online, genuine research and scholarship remains gated and prohibitively expensive…”
I encourage you to read the full article here and share your thoughts on the writer’s opinions. How do you think we can collectively move towards a more equitable academic publishing system?
Let’s discuss it!
Is open science and publishing really the way to go?
It is really sad indeed!!. I think the ‘reputable publishers’ seem to be more predatory than the so-called ‘predatory publishers and journals’. It is even disgusting when you use your time to review manuscripts for the ‘big boys’ for free, but they still request APC when the same person who reviewed sends a manuscript to them. We really need to find a better way to disseminate academic output without putting financial strains on universities and academics.
you raise great points